Legal Opinion · Dissent

Estate of Cowart v. Nicklos Drilling Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 22, 1992No. 91-17Published

1Dissent

Justice Blackmun,

with whom Justice Stevens and Justice O'Connor join,

dissenting.

For more than 14 years, the Director of the Office of Workers' Compensation Programs interpreted the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (LHWCA or Act), 44 Stat. 1424, as amended, 33 U. S. C. §901 et seq., in the very same way that petitioner Floyd Cowart’s estate now urges. Indeed, the Director advocated Cowart’s position in the Court of Appeals, both before the panel and before that court en banc.

After certiorari was granted, however, and after Cowart’s opening brief was filed, the federal respondent…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Barnhill v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Atlantic Cleaners & Dyers, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Northeast Marine Terminal Co. v. CaputoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs v. Perini North River AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Banks v. Chicago Grain Trimmers Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API