Legal Opinion

Roper v. Crosier

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1917No. 2889Published

Appeal from District Court, Sixth District; Hon. Joseph H. Erickson, Judge. Action by Pricilla Roper against A. J. Crosier and others. Judgment for plaintiff. Certain defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtCorfman, J.

This was an action instituted in the district court of Salt Lake County by the plaintiff to recover from the defendants $2,500 alleged to have been paid by the plaintiff to apply on orchard land contracts with a corporation organized by the defendants. A change of venue was had to the district court of Sevier County, where a trial to the court, without a jury, resulted in a judgment in plaintiff’s favor against all of the defendants. The defendants, other than J. H. Nelson, appeal from the judgment.

The amended complaint in substance alleges:

' ‘ That the defendants, on or about the 22d day of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Donovan v. PurtellIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  2. McGrew v. City Produce ExchangeTennessee Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Heckendorn v. RomadkaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API