Legal Opinion

Ford Motor Co. v. Noland Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 17, 1988No. 75161, 75162PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff Noland Company filed this action to foreclose a materialman’s lien on the property of defendant Ford Motor Company. The lien in question arose from a contract between defendant Ford Motor Company and Barge/Arconic, a Joint Venture (“Barge”) for the construction of certain improvements at an automobile assembly plant. Barge entered into a sub-contract for the furnishing of labor and materials with Huffman-Wolfe Company. Huffman-Wolfe Company issued a purchase order to plaintiff who delivered, pursuant thereto, goods and materials which have not been paid…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. American Hospital Supply Corp. v. Starline Manufacturing Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  2. Amafra Enterprises, Inc. v. All-Steel Buildings, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gwinnett-Club Associates, L.P. v. Southern Electric Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  2. Noland Co. v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1988
  3. Ford Motor Co. v. Noland Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  4. Ford Motor Co. v. Noland Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API