Legal Opinion

Nickerson v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1971No. 1295, 1296PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ERWIN, Justice.

This is a companion case to Tarnef v. State, Op. No. 758, 492 P.2d 109 (Alaska, December 30, 1971). Nickerson was a participant in the events which led to his indictment and the indictment of Tarnef for possession and sale of heroin. Nickerson was assigned a separate trial scheduled to immediately follow Tarnef’s trial. 1 In this appeal from a conviction for “selling or possessing” a narcotic drug, Nickerson asserts that he was denied a speedy trial, that the indictment, jury instructions and verdict form were duplicitous, and that the sentence imposed was excessive. We…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. EwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. ChaneyAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Waters v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Rutherford v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Glasgow v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. McClain v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Taggard v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Tarnef v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Vail v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. MouserCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API