United States v. Runner
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAH, Circuit Judge.
By this appeal, we are asked to decide whether in the course of a condemnation proceedings, it is reversible error to submit the question of value of separately owned tracts of land to the jury as a single unit or tract, over the objection of the condemnor.
In April 1947, the United States filed its petition to condemn forty-nine tracts of land in Blaine and Dewey counties, Oklahoma, one of which was the 200 acres involved in this suit. On October 3, 1947, the court entered an order finding that the appellees here were the owners of the land and entitled to receive just…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kohl v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Pietch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
- Meadows v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
- Thomson v. BolesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
- United States v. 25.936 ACRES OF LAND, ETC.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. DowSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Elizabeth Annat v. Daniel B. Beard and Warren J. Hamilton, Elizabeth Annat v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- Goldzweig v. Winterland Concessions Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986