Legal Opinion

People v. Castro

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 30, 2006No. B182028PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HASTINGS, J.*

Defendant Rodolfo Castro was convicted of felony false imprisonment (Pen. Code, § 236)1 as well as child molestation (§ 647.6, subd. (a)). He appeals his conviction for felony false imprisonment on the ground that there was insufficient evidence at trial to support the conviction. In the alternative, he contends the trial court erred in failing to instruct, sua *139sponte, on the lesser included offense of misdemeanor false imprisonment. We agree the court erred in failing to provide an instruction on misdemeanor false imprisonment, a point conceded by respondent, and we…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. BrevermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. MoonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  3. People v. MatianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. People v. HendrixCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. IslasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. Saavedra-Figueroa v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. People v. WardellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. People v. AispuroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. People v. GhiprielCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API