Legal Opinion

Gurganus v. Kiker

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 10, 1970No. 6 Div. 670Published

1Opinion

ON REHEARING

2Per curiam

On application for rehearing, defendant contends that the evidence, even its most favorable interpretation to plaintiffs, did not authorize the trial court’s rendition of judgment for the plaintiffs.

The offered bases of defendant’s contention are two:(1) That the plaintiffs’ action was barred by the ten-year statute of limitations (Code of Alabama 1940, Recompiled in 1958, Title 7, Sec. 20), and(2) That the evidence was not sufficient to warrant a finding that plaintiffs, or any of plaintiffs’ remote grantors, or plaintiffs’ immediate grantor, was ever in possession of the subject…

3Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Life Ins. Co. v. HarmonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  2. Ellis v. StickneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  3. Strickland v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  4. Birmingham Railway & Electric Co. v. WildmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  5. Southern Railway Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API