Legal Opinion

Vendome Hotel, Inc. v. Gibson

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 16, 1952No. 18,291PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Royse, P. J.

In its petition for rehearing appellant contends that where, as in this case, appellee did not file an answer brief, we must reverse if appellant has presented a prima facie case of reversible error. This is not correct. It is a matter of discretion with this court. City of Connersville v. Adams (1952), 122 Ind. App. 581, 105 N. E. 2d 912; Meadows et al. v. Hickman et al. (1947), 225 Ind. 146, 73 N. E. 2d 343. The majority opinion in effect held appellant had. not, by its brief, presented a prima facie case of reversible error.. .

It next complains because…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Meadows v. HickmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1947
  2. City of Connersville v. AdamsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1952

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Vendome Hotel, Inc. v. GibsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API