Legal Opinion

Orlando v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 23, 1996No. 96-868Published

1Per curiam

We find no merit in the defendant’s contentions that certain comments made by the prosecutor vitiated his entire trial and therefore affirm on the basis of § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (1995); Holton v. State, 573 So.2d 284 (Fla.1990), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 960, 111 S.Ct. 2275,114 L.Ed.2d 726 (1991); Duest v. State, 462 So.2d 446 (Fla.1985); Irving v. State, 627 So.2d 92 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Hightower v. State, 592 So.2d 689 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Shaara v. State, 581 So.2d 1339 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

However, the state concedes error as to the defendant’s sentence for robbery, so we reverse that sentence…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Holton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  2. Forbes v. Holiday Corp. Savings & Retirement PlanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Duest v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  4. Irving v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  5. Shaara v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API