Legal Opinion

Cochran v. Ozark Country Club, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 24, 1976PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case involves the application of Code of Ala., Tit. 46, § 65, which regulates those engaged in the business of general contracting, specifically the construction of structures costing $20,000 or more.

Plaintiff, Cochran, and defendant, Ozark Country Club, entered into a contract whereby Cochran was to build a swimming pool for Ozark and to be paid $36,939.72 plus 15% of that sum. Cochran realized he was in derogation of § 65 and agreed with Ozark to divide the original contract into two separate contracts of less than $20,000 each. The pool was built, he was paid over $35,000, and now…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cooper v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  2. Tucker v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BallewSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  2. Med Plus Properties v. COLCOCK CONST.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  3. Hawkins v. LeagueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  4. Thomas Learning Center, Inc. v. McGuirkCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2000
  5. White v. MillerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API