United Factors Corp. v. Mogul
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Stadtpeld, J.,
Opinion by
This is an action in assumpsit which came before Bluett, J., in the court below, on a rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense and new matter. In addition to the pleadings, the court below had before it a notice served upon counsel for the defendant, notifying him of plaintiff’s intention to present evidence of the law of the State of New York pertaining to the issues and to request the court to take judicial notice of the common law and statutes of the State of New York.
According to the statement of claim, the plaintiff is engaged in the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Peter Adams Paper Co. v. CassardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
- Hartley Silk Manufacturing Co. v. BergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
- Ueberroth v. RiegelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1872
3Cited by4 opinions
- Harry L. Sheinman & Sons, Inc. v. Scranton Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Revlett v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1943
- Knight Trust, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1949
- Minnick v. Scheffy, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County1948