Legal Opinion

Savannah, Florida & Western Railway Co. v. Steinhauser

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 17, 1904PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action for damages.- Before Judge Norwood. City court of Savannah. .June 4, 1904.

1Opinion of the CourtCobb, J.

When this case was here before (Steinhauser v. Railway Company, 118 Ga. 195), it was held that the evidence showed negligence on the part of the defendant, and that it being doubtful under the evidence whether the plaintiff was also negligent, this question should have been submitted to a jury. The evidence on the question of whether the plaintiff was negligent was certainly, on the last trial, no weaker than it was on the former hearing, and it is possibly stronger in his favor on this point. A careful examination of both records fully warrants the ■statement that the evidence on this point…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McIntyre v. McIntyreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Steinhauser v. Savannah, Florida & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Frank v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  2. Frank v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  3. Davis v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API