Legal Opinion

Detroit & Mackinac Railway Co. v. Michigan Railroad Commission

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 3, 1916No. 68PublishedCited by 10 opinions

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP MICHIGAN. The facts, which involve the constitutionality under the due process provision of the Fourteenth Amendment of an order granting a writ of mandamus enforcing obedience to an order of the Michigan Railroad Commission directing a railroad company to relay tracks removed by it from a logging spur, are stated in the opinion.

Read the full summary

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP MICHIGAN. The facts, which involve the constitutionality under the due process provision of the Fourteenth Amendment of an order granting a writ of mandamus enforcing obedience to an order of the Michigan Railroad Commission directing a railroad company to relay tracks removed by it from a logging spur, are stated in the opinion. It was not competent for the Supreme Court of Michigan while the case in the Wayne Circuit was pending and undetermined to order the railroad company to restore the Tubbs Branch .and to resume service thereon. The failure of…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Van Devanter

This was a petition to the Supreme Court of Michigan by the Railroad Commission of that State for a writ of mandamus to enforce obedience to an order of the commission directing the Detroit & Mackinac,Railway Company to relay one-half mile of rails removed by it from a five-mile logging spur, called Tubbs Branch, and to resume service thereon. The railroad company answered, and, after a Rearing, the court granted the writ subject to a condition presently' to be stated. 178 Michigan, 230.

The commission’s action was invoked by a complaint presented by the Fletcher Paper Company, of which the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Central Transportation Co. v. Pullman's Palace Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. McPherson v. BlackerSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Mt. Vernon-Woodberry Cotton Duck Co. v. Alabama Interstate Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Davies v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. American Express Co. v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1900

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Republic Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. New York Ex Rel. Bryant v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Texas & Pac. Ry. v. Gulf, Etc., Ry.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Pacific Live Stock Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API