Legal Opinion
United States v. Carl Eugene Sadler and Michael Alfred Brandes
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided January 17, 1974No. 72-3797PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellants Sadler and Brandes were tried before a jury in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida and found guilty of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute some 80 pounds of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. Upon considering their appeal to this court, we find only two contentions which merit comment: (1) that the jury charge on entrapment was improperly phrased in terms of “lawful” and “unlawful” entrapment, and (2) that the court erred in not allowing the defense to introduce evidence in surrebuttal. After deliberating these and other issues…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Francis William GroesselCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Henry Rodella v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- United States v. Steven Paul Newcomb Anod Wayne E. Lucas, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Wilmer T. Dixon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- Alton Turner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. GoldCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Ernest A. WinkleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Howard Kenneth Bulman, Jr., L. C. Jones, A/K/A "L. C. Smith", Alex Howard, Jr., Robert Eugene RowCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Belden Inc. v. Berk-Tek LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Christopher HallCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.