Legal Opinion
United States v. David Alexander Rowlett
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 29, 1994No. 93-2228PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge.
Defendant/appellant David A. Rowlett appeals his sentence for making a false statement in the acquisition of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(6). Rowlett contends the district court erred in making a two-level upward adjustment in his base offense level under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(4) for the alleged involvement of a stolen firearm in the underlying offense, and an additional two-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1 for alleged willful obstruction of justice. While the district court properly enhanced Rowlett’s sentence for obstruction of justice under…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States National Bank v. Independent Insurance Agents of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Deal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1957
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- United States v. Scottie Ray HurstCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Marissa Giselle MasseyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Norberto B. LunaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. BattleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. WebbCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.