Handwerker v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Dismissal of the complaint was not warranted since the record presents triable issues of fact as to whether defendants had constructive notice of the alleged condition of the tree. Plaintiff submitted evidence, including affidavits from experts, showing that there were clear, visible signs of the tree’s decay that existed for several years and that defendants performed work on the tree prior to the accident (see Harris v Village of E. Hills, 41 NY2d 446 [1977]; compare Clarke v New York City Hous. Auth., 282 AD2d 202 [2001]).
The court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gallo v. LinkowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Rodriguez v. 551 Realty LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Martin v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Clarke v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
3Cited by2 opinions
- Harry Spring Consulting LLC v. EstersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Harry Spring Consulting LLC v. EstersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021