Legal Opinion
Matosantos Int’l Corp. v. P Hartford Casualty Ins. Co. & Twin City Fire Ins. Co.
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided November 29, 2021No. 21-cv-317-LMPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Matosantos Int’l Corp. v. Civil No. 1:21-cv-317-LM Opinion No.
2021 DNH 182
P Hartford Casualty Ins. Co. & Twin City Fire Ins. Co. ORDER Defendants Hartford Casualty Insurance Company and Twin City Fire Insurance Company jointly move to dismiss the first two counts of plaintiff’s complaint on the ground that they are time barred. For the following reasons, defendants’ motion to dismiss (doc. no. 8) is denied. BACKGROUND Plaintiff is a corporation that provides retail auditing and merchandizing services. In 2018, plaintiff began…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Foley v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
- Binda v. Royal InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
- Hansen v. Sentry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
- EnergyNorth Natural Gas v. Associated Elec. & Gas Ins. Services, Ltd.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1998
3Cited by1 opinion
- Matosantos International Corporation v. Hartford Casualty Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2021