Elliott v. Bell
West Virginia Supreme Court
cited 4 W. Va. 186; 10 W. Va. 236; Code, p. 451, s. 55; 2 Sto. Eq. Juris, (s. p.) 1432; Bar. Ch’y Pr. 24, 25 ; 1 High Inj. 239; 4 Johns. Ch’y 375 ; 1 Ban. Ch’y Pr. 782; Bar. Ch’y Pr. 177; 27 Graft. 928; 7 W. Va. 690 ; 26 W. Va. 563; 21 W. Va. 83; Code, p. 882; 20 W. Va. 429, 447 ; Bar. Ch’y Pr. 1061.
1Opinion of the Court
Beannon, J udge :
Elliott brought a chancery suit to enforce a judgment recovered by Woodford, Glasscock and Elliott against Bell against Bell’s land ; and, the judgment having been decreed against the land, along with others brought in under a convention of lienors under a commissioner’s report, Bell appeals.
Bell complains that a claim in his favor was not allowed as a set-off. It was a sum of one hundred and two dollars and ten cents paid by him as toll on a turnpike to Woodford, Glasscock and Elliott in excess of the rate prescribed by law. The judgment sued upon was in favor of Woodford,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Core v. StricklerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1884
- Foutty v. PoarWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1891
- Matthews v. DunbarWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1869
3Cited by10 opinions
- Willingham, Wright & Covington v. GloverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
- Benedum v. First Citizens BankWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1913
- Turley v. ThomasNevada Supreme Court · 1909
- Hamby v. CollierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
- Wallace v. PrichardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1922
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.