Legal Opinion

Hirsh v. City of Atlanta

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 15, 1991No. S90A1387, S90A1494PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Benham, Justice.

The City of Atlanta, having declared the actions of certain protestors to be a public nuisance, sought and was granted an injunction against Operation Rescue, several named individuals, and Jane and John Doe, described as others acting in concert with any of the named defendants in the complained of conduct. Contending that aspects of the injunction violate their First Amendment right of free speech, appellant Hirsh, a named defendant, and appellant Williams, who asserted he was a “John Doe,” appeal from the entry of certain portions of the injunction.1

*23At the hearing on the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. GraceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Harris v. Entertainment Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1989
  5. Evans Theatre Corporation v. SlatonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Operation Rescue v. Women's Health CenterSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. Pro-Choice Network v. Project Rescue Western New YorkDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1992
  3. Bo Fancy Productions, Inc. v. Rabun County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  4. City of Atlanta v. ChambersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  5. Denton v. Browns Mill Development Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API