Legal Opinion
Haverstock v. Wolf
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided June 6, 1980No. Civ. No. 4-77-457PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MacLAUGHLIN, District Judge.
This is a statutory interpleader action brought by plaintiffs, the Co-Administrators C.T.A. of the Estate of Lee Warden, as disinterested stakeholders of a $29,500.00 fund pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1335(a). The Court previously dismissed plaintiffs from the action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2361, and bonds and currency in excess of $29,500.00 have been deposited with the Clerk of Court. The Court has jurisdiction over this proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1335 and 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The following memorandum constitutes the Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison, a Partnership v. The Telex Corporation, a Corporation, and Telex Computer Products, Inc., AcorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Holt v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Kittler & Hedelson v. Sheehan Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Burns v. ValeneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Kelly v. KennedySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McKenzie Construction, Inc. v. Desmond L. MaynardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- McKenzie Constraction, Inc. v. MaynardDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1983
- McKenzie Construction, Inc. v. Desmond L. MaynardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985