Legal Opinion
Clements v. Aramark Corp.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 29, 2018No. AC39488PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtBright, J.
The principal issue in this appeal is the compensability, under the Workers' Compensation Act (act), General Statutes § 31-275 et seq., of an injury to an employee that occurred on an employer's premises when the employee became lightheaded, fell, and hit her head while walking to her work station before the start of her shift. The plaintiff, Sharon Clements, appeals from the decision of the Workers' Compensation Review Board (board) affirming the decision of the Workers' Compensation Commissioner for the Second District (commissioner) in favor of the defendant employer, Aramark Corporation…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Larke v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Gonier v. Chase Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- Savage v. St. Aeden's ChurchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Spatafore v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Blakeslee v. PLATT BROS. AND CO.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Clements v. Aramark Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2021