Legal Opinion

Collier v. Varco-Pruden Buildings

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided May 11, 1995No. Civ. A. Nos. 6:95-430-20, 6:95-431-20PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HERLONG, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on the motion of the defendant, Varco-Pruden Buildings (“Varco-Pruden”), to dismiss the complaints in the above-referenced actions and on the motion of the plaintiff, Debra Collier (“Collier”), for leave to amend her complaints. For the reasons that follow, Collier’s motion for leave to amend is granted in part and Vareo-Pruden’s motion to dismiss is granted in part.

Collier, personal representative of the estate of Randy Collier, commenced these wrongful death and survival actions after her husband died as a result of injuries…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Bryant v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  3. Dennis v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
  4. Christenbury v. HedrickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  5. Thornton v. Cessna Aircraft Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Johnson v. Allstate Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API