Legal Opinion

Engle v. Tennis Coal Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 10, 1907PublishedCited by 3 opinions

CASE 27. — ACTION BY ALBERT ENGLE AGAINST THE TENNIS COAL COMPANY TO QUIET TITLE TO LAND. Appeal from Perry Circuit Court. M. J. Moss, Circuit Judge. Judgment for defendant. ‘Plaintiff appeals. AUTHORITIES. A writ of forcible entry and detainer or forcible detainer does not involve the question as to title to land. (Mason v. Bascom, • 3 B. Mon., 272; Lancaster v. Lancaster, 19 Ky.

Read the full summary

CASE 27. — ACTION BY ALBERT ENGLE AGAINST THE TENNIS COAL COMPANY TO QUIET TITLE TO LAND. Appeal from Perry Circuit Court. M. J. Moss, Circuit Judge. Judgment for defendant. ‘Plaintiff appeals. AUTHORITIES. A writ of forcible entry and detainer or forcible detainer does not involve the question as to title to land. (Mason v. Bascom, • 3 B. Mon., 272; Lancaster v. Lancaster, 19 Ky. Law Rep., 577.) 2. Records of judgments of forcible entry and detainer are not admissible in evidence in bar of an action of ejectment. (Mattox v. Hahn, 5 Littell, 187). 4. Bills to quiet title construed. (Clark v.…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinión of the Court by

Judge Barker

Reversing.

This action was instituted in the Perry circuit court for the purpose of quieting the title of the plaintiff, Albert Engle, to a tract of land situated in Perry county, set out by metes and bounds in the petition. The petition alleges the legal title and possession of the land to be in the plaintiff, and that the defendant (appellee) is wrongfully setting up claim to the whole boundary described, and giving out in words and *241speeches its claim to be the owner of the property,, although its claim is worthless; that this false and. worthless claim of…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shinkle v. TurnerKentucky Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Holman v. ParsonsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  3. Clarke v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API