Legal Opinion

Schouten v. Alpine

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1912PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

The questions upon which the trial court reserved decision on defendant’s motion for a new trial were, first, whether, conceding the unlawful expulsion of the plaintiff by the local union, the defendant, the national or parent organization was liable in damages, and in the second place, whether the verdict of the jury was excessive. The first question was discussed at some length on defendant’s motion to dismiss, made at the end of plaintiff’s case. It seems to me, on going over the testimony and the constitution and by-laws of the defendant and its local branch or union, that the relation of…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Local No. 2, International Brotherhood of Telephone Workers v. International Brotherhood of Telephone WorkersDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1966
  2. Robinson v. DahmNew York Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Schouten v. AlpineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API