Othoudt v. Addison Fur Corp.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.
Charles V. Othoudt and E. Pearl Othoudt invested $4,000 in two pairs of silver black foxes, claimed to be of a particularly fine strain. It was expected that there would be a large profit made from their increase. Plaintiffs ranched the foxes at one of the fox farms of defendant Addison Fur Corporation. Two contracts were entered into, one referring to the increase from the foxes, and the other, dated October 1, 1927, referring to a ranching fee of $150 per year for each pair of foxes. The latter contract contained the following provisions:
“Neither said foxes nor the benefits accruing to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Whitlock v. HeardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1848
- Schneider v. DaytonMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- McCoy v. HockSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
3Cited by3 opinions
- Flesher v. HandlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Clark v. OldhamNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
- Clark v. OldhamNebraska Supreme Court · 1958