State ex rel. Oregon State Treasurer v. Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, P. J.
In State Treasurer v. Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., 241 Or App 107, 250 P3d 371 (2011) CMarsh I), we held that a stock purchaser seeking to recover under ORS 59.137 for securities law violations must prove direct reliance rather than utilize a presumption of reliance under the “fraud-on-the-market” doctrine recognized under federal securities law. The Supreme Court subsequently reversed our decision, concluding that the Oregon legislature intended to incorporate the fraud-on-the-market doctrine when it enacted ORS 59.137. State Treasurer v. Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., 353 Or 1, 23,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust FundsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.