Legal Opinion

Bursztyn v. Bursztyn

District Court, D. Rhode Island

Decided October 24, 2019No. 1:19-cv-00525Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND MOSHE BURSZTYN : : v. : C.A. No. 19-00525-WES : KAYLA BURSZTYN : REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION FOR SUMMARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) Lincoln D. Almond, United States Magistrate Judge Pending before me for determination are Plaintiff’s Applications to Proceed In forma Pauperis (“IFP”) (ECF Nos. 2 and 5) pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915

without being required to prepay costs or fees, including the $400.00 civil case filing fee. After reviewing Plaintiff’s Applications signed under penalty of perjury, I conclude that Plaintiff is unable…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API