Legal Opinion

Doughney v. Fauset

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1958PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.

The defendants are named as Arthur H. Fauset, Howard University and the estate of Alain L. Locke. The university and the estate, appearing specially, bring separate motions to vacate alleged service of process upon them.

As to the estate, the plaintiff conceded on the argument that service on Charles Williams as alleged managing agent thereof was ineffectual. Valid service is claimed to have been made in each of several other ways: by service upon the attorney for the estate, upon the clerk of the Surrogate’s Court, and upon the defendant Fauset.

The court did not acquire jurisdiction over the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United States Mortgage & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. Leonard v. . PierceNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  3. McCoy v. Erie Forge & Steel Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  4. In re the Estate of ShaulNew York Surrogate's Court · 1951
  5. McCoy v. Erie Forge & Steel Co.New York Supreme Court · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Anzio Frocks, Inc. v. Joint Board Dress & Waistmakers' Union of Greater New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
  2. Dart v. FehlNew York Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API