Legal Opinion

United States v. Paz-Castillo

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 27, 2014No. 14-1036Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

MARY BECK BRISCOE, Chief Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously to honor the parties’ request for a decision on the briefs without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is, therefore, submitted without oral argument.

Ildefonso Paz-Castillo pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute more than 100 grams of a mixture and substance containing a detectable amount of heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(B)(i). After applying the “dangerous…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. McKissickCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  2. United States v. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  3. United States v. HishawCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  4. United States v. Martinez-BarraganCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API