Legal Opinion

People v. Layhew

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 21, 1989No. 5-87-0534PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Howerton

Defendant was tried by jury in Pope County and convicted of aggravated criminal sexual assault.

The jury was not instructed in writing, at the close of the case, that defendant was presumed innocent and that the State had the burden of proving his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Defendant neither requested nor tendered the instruction. However, during voir dire the prospective jurors were questioned on both concepts, and the jurors were reminded of both concepts in closing arguments; nevertheless, we reverse and remand.

The instruction reads:

“Defendant is presumed to be innocent of the charges…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kentucky v. WhortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. People v. YoungbeyIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  3. People v. FrenchAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  4. People v. DonaldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  5. People v. WilliamsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. LayhewIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  2. People v. StrongAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  3. In re Appointment of Special ProsecutorAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  4. People v. MondhinkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  5. People v. LayhewAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API