Legal Opinion

Flagg v. Marion County

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1897PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From Marion: George H. Burnett, Judge. Action by the 'firm of Flagg & Oronise against Marion County to recover the contract price of printing certain election ballots. A demurrer to the complaint was sustained, and plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Bean.

This is an action against Marion County to recover a balance of $290, alleged to be due the plaintiffs for printing election ballots. The plaintiffs allege in their complaint that in May, 1894, they were employed *20by the clerk of the defendant county to print sixty thousand election ballots, for the agreed and stipulated sum of $700; that they duly performed their contract, and presented a bill for the sum stipulated to the county court for payment, but that the same has not been paid, or any part thereof, except the sum of $410, and judgment is demanded for the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Board of County Commissioners v. SeawellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
  2. Brick v. Plymouth CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
  3. Fulton v. Monona CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
  4. Star Line of Steamers v. Van VlietMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Libby v. OlcottOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Paulson v. CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Wallowa County v. OakesOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Irwin v. Klamath CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API