Legal Opinion

Rzepka v. 50 E. 78th Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 1, 1999PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries based on violations of the Labor Law, the defendant Polir Construction, Inc., appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated August 19, 1998, as denied that branch of its motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the cause of action pursuant to Labor Law § 241 (6) insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

To support a cause of action pursuant to Labor Law § 241 (6), the plaintiff must allege violations of a specific provision of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Rizzuto v. L.A. Wenger Contracting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Chavious v. Friends AcademyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Piazza v. Frank L. Ciminelli Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. Pino v. Robert Martin Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API