Legal Opinion

People v. Choremi

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 11, 1950PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFuld, J.

Though there is serious doubt as to the sufficiency of the information filed against defendant (cf. People v. Zambounis, 251 N. Y. 94, 95-96; People v. Santoro, 229 N. Y. 277, 282-283; People v. Albow, 140 N. Y. 130, 134), we choose to place our decision upon the ground that there is no evidence in the record before us to establish that she is a vagrant under subdivision 4 of section 887 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Concededly, there is nothing in the record except three wiretapped telephone conversations between defendant and Madeleine Blavier — one on May 5, another on May 20 and the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. ZambounisNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. People v. . SantoroNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. People v. . AlbowNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. People v. OrrNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  5. People v. SohnNew York Court of Appeals · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. Skolnick, New York County Courts1951
  2. People v. CatalanoNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API