Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Islamic Republic of Iran

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 11, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2001-2094PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs moved for sanctions against garnishee HSBC Bank USA, N.A. (“HBUS”) in the amount of roughly $2.7 billion (plus interest) based on their failure to disclose three blocked electronic fund transfers (“EFTs”) of less than $25,000 in total. Pis.’ Sanctions Mot., ECF No. 485. Plaintiffs also moved to schedule discovery and oral argument. Pis.’ Scheduling Mot., ECF No. 494. Because HBUS committed no sanctionable conduct, the Court will DENY both motions.

I. BACKGROUND

This case is the lead action arising from the 1983 bombing of the United…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Peterson v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  2. Shipping Corp. of India Ltd. v. Jaldhi Overseas PTE Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  3. In Re Islamic Republic of Iran Terrorism LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  4. Estate of John Doe v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  5. Estate of Heiser v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Peterson v. Islamic RepublicDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API