Harrison v. Chicago, Mil. & St. P. Ry. Co.
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from circuit court, Yankton county. Hon. E. .G. Smith, Judge. This case was first decided by this court in an opinion filed Oct. 17, 1894, reported in 6 S. D. 100, 60 N. W. 405, in which opinion the judgment of the trial court in favor of the plaintiff was reversed.
1Opinion of the CourtKellam, J.
This case was decided at the present term, the opinion being published in 6 S. D. 100, 60 N. W. 405. Upon the ground that the printed abstract upon which the case was heard and decided by this court is incomplete, and unfair to him, respondent asks leave to present an amended abstract and for a rehearing of the case. It is not claimed that appellant’s abstract, duly served on respondent’s attorney, was deliberately' or willfully unfair; but it is urged that from it was omitted much material testimony, upon which the case was decided in the trial court. Ordinarily, this would furnish no ground…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Harrison v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
- Searles v. ChristensenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
- Jones Lumber & Mercantile Co. v. FarisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
- Merchants Nat. Bank v. McKinneySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re Seydel's EstateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900