Legal Opinion
United States v. Pratt
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided November 28, 1967No. Cr. No. 340-64, Civ. No. 852-67PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHAW, District Judge.
Charles T. Wallace and Arthur J. Zickl, charged by indictment in Criminal No. 340-64 with violation of. 18 U.S.C. § 371, were convicted on respective pleas of guilty and each was sentenced to serve a term of imprisonment of five years, the maximum provided by statute. Arthur J. Zickl moved pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate sentence alleging in substance that he had a constitutional right to receive credit for 246 days spent in custody prior to the imposition of the five year sentence. His application is filed in Civil No. 852-67. A letter application of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Draper v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- William Dunn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
- Vincent Amato v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sobell v. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- Sobell v. Attorney GeneralDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
- Sobell v. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968