Legal Opinion

Menella v. Office of Court Administration

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1984PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*64OPINION OF THE COURT

Herbert Kramer, J.

Petitioner, a court clerk, seeks to compel a change of job classification, pursuant to CPLR article 78.

Respondents, the present and former State Administrative Judges, appeared by personal attorneys employed by the Office of Court Administration (hereinafter referred to as OCA) and seek to change venue. The defendant, Classification Review Board (hereinafter CRB), appeared by the Attorney-General.

Two grounds were advanced for change of venue:

1. Noncompliance with CPLR 506, and

2. Discretionary change of venue based on the appearance of judicial impropriety.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. ShinkleNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Sassower v. SignorelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. McGuinness v. New York State Office of Court AdministrationNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Killen v. Property Clerk Division Police DepartmentCivil Court of the City of New York · 1981
  5. Knight v. New York State Department of Environmental ConservationNew York Supreme Court · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Coaxum v. New York State Board of ParoleNew York Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API