Legal Opinion

Marshall v. State Department of Public Health & Welfare

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 7, 1972No. 25826PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIXON, Judge.

This appeal involves denial of retroactive benefits to an applicant for Old Age Assistance and requires construction of the 1969 amendment to Section 208.090 V.A. M.S.1 As enacted in 1969, it reads as follows :

“If an application has been denied or if the applicant has been removed from the rolls and is found by the Director to be eligible after his appeal is heard, reinstatement and payment of benefits shall be made as of the date the application was denied or the applicant was removed from the rolls.”

Robert L. Marshall applied for Old Age Assistance, and the initial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Page v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  2. Wigand v. State Department of Public Health & WelfareMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Chapman v. State Social Security CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1941

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chrismer v. Missouri State Division of Family ServicesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Shefton v. Missouri State Division of Family ServicesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Rader v. Missouri State Division of Family ServicesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Evenson v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API