Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re the Probate of the Will of Reckford

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 3, 1954Published

1Dissent

Lewis, Ch. J.

(dissenting). Without repeating relevant facts which have been fairly and accurately set forth by Judge Van Voobhis, writing for a majority of the court, the basis of our dissent from the majority view can be briefly stated.

During the forty years of his life tenancy, Samuel J. Beck-ford kept no permanent records of his dealings with property of which his wife, by her will, gave him only the life use. Instead, his executor has discovered that he ‘ ‘ followed the consistent practice of destroying records as they became more than six months old.” It does not appear of record that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Seaward v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. Farmers' Loan Trust Co. v. . MortimerNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. White v. RankinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  4. Peck v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  5. In Re the Will of Von KleistNew York Court of Appeals · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API