Wolbrette v. New Orleans Drug Co.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Action by Jules .Wolbrette against the Néw Orleans Drug Company, Incorporated, which took a suspensive appeal from an order appointing a receiver. Application of the respondent Drug Company for writs of Mandamus to compel the receiver to furnish funds to pay for the transcript and prohibition to prevent the carrying on of business pending the' áppeal.
1Opinion of the CourtProvosty, J.
The defendant corporation has taken a suspensive appeal from an order appointing a receiver, and has perfected the appeal by giving bond; but, the receiver having taken charge of all of its property, it is without funds with which to pay for the transcript of appeal in order to file it in this court. It has applied in vain to the receiver to pay for this manuscript, and, to the trial judge to compel him to do so, ana now applies to this court for a mandamus in the premises.
Moreover, the learned trial judge has ruled that, notwithstanding the suspensive character of said appeal, the receiver…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Blaise v. Security Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
3Cited by6 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Schacht v. MAIN INSUR. CO.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- Watson v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- O'Malley v. Continental Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
- Sims v. Homeseekers Fire InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1938
- Louque v. Hercules Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.