Legal Opinion

Quintal v. City of Hallowell

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided October 7, 2008No. Docket: Ken-07-195PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClifford, J.

[¶ 1] Gary Quintal appeals from a summary judgment entered in the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Studstrwp, J.) in favor of the City of Hallowell and James Rhodes. The summary judgment was entered on Quintal’s complaint seeking review of the termination of his employment by the City pursuant to M.R. Civ. P. 80B, and alleging violations of Quintal’s First and Fourteenth Amendment rights, violation of the Freedom of Access Act, and interference with Quintal’s contractual relationship with the City. Quintal contends that the court erred in finding that no issues of material fact exist for…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Garcetti v. CeballosSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. McDonald v. City of West BranchSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gorham v. Androscoggin CountySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
  2. Hilderbrand v. Washington County CommissionersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
  3. York Hospital v. Department of Health & Human ServicesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
  4. Lawson v. WillisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019
  5. Daniel R. Lawson v. Debby WillisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API