Legal Opinion
Matador Service, Inc. v. Maas Transport, Inc.
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 1, 1979No. Civ. 9522PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.
Maas Transport, Inc. (Maas) and C. J. Austad and Son, Inc. (Austad) appeal from a district court order that affirmed the Public Service Commission’s order to revoke Maas’ Special Common Motor Carrier Certificate on the grounds of abandonment. We affirm.
Maas had authority to operate in this state from the Public Service Commission (PSC) pursuant to Special Motor Carrier Certificate No. 251. 1 In the early 1960’s, Maas was an active carrier, owning and operating over 30 tractors and 40 trailers. Business had declined in recent years, however, to an occasional truck…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Geo. E. Haggart, Inc. v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. McDonaldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
- Bank of Hamilton v. State Banking BoardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- O'Brien v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- Musslewhite v. State Corporation CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Barrett Mobile Home Transport, Inc. v. Skjonsby Truck Line, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- HENTZ TRUCK LINE, INC., ETC. v. ElkinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- Hentz Truck Line, Inc., Roseville v. ElkinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- Barrett Mobile Home Transport, Inc. v. Skjonsby Truck Line, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- Duane Hall Trucking, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1987