Legal Opinion

Kern v. Continental Bank

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 12, 1932No. 270Published

1Opinion of the Court

JUSTICE, PJ.

During the course of the trial, counsel for plaintiff sought to introduce in evidence, certain sections of the General Code; that is to say, §§710-173-175, 8147 and 8149. The defendant objected to the introduction of these statutes, and the trial court sustained the objections; and, as we see it, very properly so. The trial court took judicial notice of these sections and it was neither necessary nor proper for plaintiff to prove them.

On cross-examination of C. P. Palmer, the -cashier of the defendant bank, counsel for plaintiff inquired of him if he did not know, at the time he…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Burke v. BurkeOhio Court of Appeals · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API