Legal Opinion

Barkeij v. Lockheed Aircraft Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 27, 1954No. 11484PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENMAN, Chief Judge.

This action is now before this court upon an appeal by the plaintiff below from the first final judgment herein, entered April 23, 1946, dismissing the complaint with prejudice at the conclusion of plaintiff’s case. The action is for alleged infringement of two patents held by Barkeij, numbers 2,145,577 and 2,191,746. This judgment was accompanied by and based upon findings of fact and conclusions of law. ' The district court found that, on the admissions of plaintiff’s witnesses, the accused engine models do not infringe either of the two patents; and that both patents in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. United Carbon Co. v. Binney & Smith Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Sessions v. RomadkaSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Dunbar v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  5. Slawson v. Grand Street RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1883

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Corning Glass Works, in No. 15923 v. Anchor Hocking Glass Corporation, in No. 15924Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
  2. Bruce Howes v. The Great Lakes Press Corporation, Holt Manufacturing Company, and Devries BrothersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  3. Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd. v. Packard Bell Electronics Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 1968
  4. The Borden Company v. Clearfield Cheese Co., Inc., a Pennsylvania CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
  5. B. F. Goodrich Co. v. United States Rubber Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1956

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API