People v. Pfendler
New York County Courts
1Opinion of the CourtJohn J. Walsh, J.
The defendant appeals on two grounds, either of which would require a reversal.
The first is that the information was insufficient in that it was actually based on information and belief and there were no supporting affidavits. On its face, the information was sufficient (cf. People v. Bertram, 302 N. Y. 526).
The question presented is whether the information was merely a pleading in a criminal action rather than the source of the court’s jurisdiction (see People v. Belcher, 302 N. Y. 529).
Since the Belcher case is predicated upon a lawful arrest, defendant contends that the arrest was made…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. BelcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- People v. BertramNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- People v. Sansalone, New York County Courts1955
- People v. LesinskiNew York Supreme Court · 1958
- People v. Goedkoop, New York County Courts1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. ConnellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. BlandaNew York Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. LyallMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
- People v. SeamanSuffolk County District Court · 1970
- People v. BronzinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.