Legal Opinion

Anton Zaika v. Field Office Director, et al.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided May 1, 2026No. 2:26-cv-01196Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 ANTON ZAIKA, 7 8 Petitioner, Case No. C26-1196-RSM 9 v. ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR 10 WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS UNDER FIELD OFFICE DIRECTOR, et al.,

28 U.S.C. § 2241

11 Respondents. 12 13 14 This matter comes before the Court on pro se Petitioner Anton Zaika’s Petition for Writ 15 of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Dkt. #1. The Court has reviewed the certified 16 petition, the Government’s Response, Dkt. #5, and the remainder of the record. The following 17 facts are taken from the verified petition and a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Hamdi v. RumsfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Relco Locomotives, Inc. v. Allrail, Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API