Legal Opinion

Agency Development, Inc. v. Medamerica Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 9, 2005No. Docket Nos. 04-2238, 04-3975PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be, and it hereby is, AFFIRMED.

Plaintiffs brought this action against defendants after defendants terminated a long term contract between the parties, as per the terms of the contract. Plaintiffs asserted a variety of federal and state antitrust claims and common law claims including breach of contract, fraud, and unfair competition. Plaintiffs also moved to amend the complaint to add a cause of action for false advertising under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)(1)(B).

With…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Laura Kropelnicki, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Hal Siegel, Linda Strumpf, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  2. Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc. v. Fendi Usa, Inc., and Fendi Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  3. Agency Development, Inc. v. Med America Insurance Co. of New YorkDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2004
  4. Agency Dev., Inc. v. MedAmerica Ins. Co. of New YorkDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2004

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fido's Fences, Inc. v. Canine Fence Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2009
  2. Katzel v. American International Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API