Agency Development, Inc. v. Medamerica Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be, and it hereby is, AFFIRMED.
Plaintiffs brought this action against defendants after defendants terminated a long term contract between the parties, as per the terms of the contract. Plaintiffs asserted a variety of federal and state antitrust claims and common law claims including breach of contract, fraud, and unfair competition. Plaintiffs also moved to amend the complaint to add a cause of action for false advertising under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)(1)(B).
With…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Laura Kropelnicki, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Hal Siegel, Linda Strumpf, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc. v. Fendi Usa, Inc., and Fendi Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Agency Development, Inc. v. Med America Insurance Co. of New YorkDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2004
- Agency Dev., Inc. v. MedAmerica Ins. Co. of New YorkDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2004
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fido's Fences, Inc. v. Canine Fence Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- Katzel v. American International Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2022