Legal Opinion

Fowler v. Krutz

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1895PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from Cloud District Court. Action to foreclose a mortgage. Of an order setting aside the foreclosure sale, Edwin Fowler, the purchaser, complains, and brings the case here. The facts appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, J.:

Edwin Fowler brings this proceeding to review a ruling of the district court in setting aside a sale of real estate. David Snavely and wife executed a mortgage upon a farm of 160 acres. He died before the mortgage was satisfied or discharged, and afterward Park B. Pulsifier purchased, from several of the Snavely heirs, an undivided sixteen-eighteenths of the farm, and at the same time assumed a proportion of the mortgage debt. The mortgage was subsequently foreclosed by the owners of the same, when the amount of the mortgage debt was found…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Deputron v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Hemme v. School District No. 4Supreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  3. Means v. RosevearSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Com'rs of the Land Office v. HarrowerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Duncan v. EckSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Farmers Life Insurance v. SteginkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  4. Fiolle v. First Nat. Bank of ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Cannon v. HewittIdaho Supreme Court · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API