Grossman v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MANNHEIMER, Judge.
Under the Alaska Supreme Court's decision in Copelin v. State, 659 P.2d 1206, 1212-14 (Alaska 1983), a person arrested for driving under the influence has the right to attempt to contact and consult an attorney before deciding whether to submit to a breath test. This appeal presents the question of whether a DUI arrestee has the right, under Copelin, to interrupt the administration of the breath test-not the 15-minute pre-testing observation period, but rather the actual testing process itself-to try to telephone an attorney. For the reasons explained here, we hold…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Copelin v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
- Saltz v. State, Department of Public Safety, Driver Improvement BureauAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
3Cited by1 opinion
- State of Alaska v. Aaron Matthew JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2021