Legal Opinion

Grossman v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided September 7, 2012No. A-10980PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MANNHEIMER, Judge.

Under the Alaska Supreme Court's decision in Copelin v. State, 659 P.2d 1206, 1212-14 (Alaska 1983), a person arrested for driving under the influence has the right to attempt to contact and consult an attorney before deciding whether to submit to a breath test. This appeal presents the question of whether a DUI arrestee has the right, under Copelin, to interrupt the administration of the breath test-not the 15-minute pre-testing observation period, but rather the actual testing process itself-to try to telephone an attorney. For the reasons explained here, we hold…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Copelin v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Saltz v. State, Department of Public Safety, Driver Improvement BureauAlaska Supreme Court · 1997

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State of Alaska v. Aaron Matthew JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API