Legal Opinion

Hartranft v. Du Pont

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 10, 1886PublishedCited by 2 opinions

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES EOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OE PENNSYLVANIA. The case is stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Woods

This was an action at law brought by Du Pont, the defendant in error, against Hartranft, collector of customs, to recover $500, that sum being the amount of a penalty unlawfully exacted by Hartranft, as collector, from Du Pont, as the latter alleged. The facts were as follows: The plaintiff resided in Wilmington, Delaware. He was the proprietor of certain powder works at Thompson’s Point, upon the Delaware River, across from Chester, Pennsylvania, and distant about two miles. He owned a wrooden boat called the Repauno, open except her forward part, which was boarded over. Her dimensions were…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. MollieU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Texas · 1876

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. GuessDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1891
  2. Hartranft v. Du PontSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API